Kevin's Blog Photography, technology, and whatever else

28Apr/100

So many choices

One of the things I was surprised about when looking around for a blog setup is the number of options you have.  Nearly all of them are free, or can be found for free somewhere.

I wanted something that was mainstream, easy, affordable, and customizable.  Being an IT guy I am comfortable running my own systems so I didn't mind setting  it up so long as the ongoing maintenance was low.  One option early was Blogger.com which is now run by Google.  This was attractive for most of the criteria accept the customizable one.  The other frontrunner was WordPress.

My hosting company even offers blogs as part of my hosting package.  I found them easy to setup and get running.  This also met almost all of the criteria accept the customizable one.  Yes I know you can customize WordPress easily, but the hosting company retained access to most of the system, and they had the versions several behind at v2.4 I think.  After doing some research it became clear that the  current version was vastly different and I like to stay as close to current as I can.

So the next option was running WordPress myself.  My hosting package also allows for MySQL databases and so this option became quickly the best one.  I was able to create a database, create a folder for the WordPress files, and begin the installation process withing WordPress within 20 minutes.  Pretty slick and it has met all the criteria easily.  Kudos to the WordPress crew.

Popularity: 2%

You might also like:

26Apr/100

Pingbacks and Trackbacks

I find the whole pingback setup a bit confusing.  I found a blog post that described how it works but the whole idea is a bit foggy still.

Popularity: 2%

Tagged as: No Comments

You might also like:

24Apr/100

ESX and Virtual SMP

In my day job I work with VMWare ESX as our server virtualization platform.  We've been using this strategy for 18-20 months now.  We've been very happy with the scalability and flexibility that this has provided, more importantly the redundancy and HA.  It truly has decreased our costs, and more importantly allowed us to be more agile in our relatively small department of just two administrators.

In our environment we have HP server hardware with NetApp SAN storage running vSphere 4 Enterprise edition.  This has been been a great architecture and has exceeded our expectations.  That was until this week.

We have an application in one of our business lines that has been running for about 4 years now and has been neglected since it was deployed.  Since it has been running without errors it has been at the bottom of our priority list due to budget and resources to address the pain points the platform has.

The most obvious bottleneck on this system is processing power.  This platform is very CPU intensive followed by disk I/O.  These make for long times to complete jobs.  Following this we are behind on the software version the platform uses for its database which we know is holding up efficiency.

We decided to bring this whole server/application into VMWare to provide the redundancy and HA that it offers, as well as be able to use the newer HP multi-core hardware that ESX is running on to assign more logical CPUs to the application.  We did some benchmarking with two, and four cores and found a drastic decrease in processing time.  We wanted to ultimately take it up to the maximum allowed by ESX which is 8 cores.  After editing the settings we tried to start up the guest and we got a pop-up window stating that the host the guest VM was running on did not support the number of cores we had assigned.

This was the frustrating part.  When looking for a reason why we couldn't run the number of processors we tried we were looking all through documentation and product specs the only reference that seemed to make sense was Virtual SMP.  We didn't exactly know what this was but there was a clear reference to Four way and Eight way Virtual SMP in the description of the different Levels of vSphere 4.  In the Enterprise version you get 'Four-way Virtual SMP' and in Enterprise Plus you get 'Eight-way Virtual SMP.'  After doing some more poking around it became clear that this meant you can only assign more than 4 logical CPUs to a guest VM if you have the Enterprise Plus edition of vSphere 4.

What this means to us is that we cannot assign the 8 processors to the guest VM like we planned to without purchasing vSphere 4 Enterprise Plus licensing.

You get only a few benefits by going to Enterprise Plus,  the now understood Eight-way 'vSMP', the ability to have up to 12 core processors (there are no processors that I know of that come close to this), vNetwork Distributed Switches, and host profiles.

Our problem now becomes the business is already expecting the 8 CPU system, and they have also come to expect the redundancy and HA.  So it seems we'll be upgrading to Enterprise Plus in our cluster.

Popularity: 48%

You might also like:

23Apr/100

Blogging about blogging

So here is my first real blog post....

I have found blogging to be a very interesting animal.  It has taken quite some time to figure out how to blog.  There is a great deal more that goes into a worthwhile blog that I originally thought.  I suppose that is true of anything that is usually taken for granted.

Popularity: 1%

You might also like:

12Apr/100

Hello world!

Welcome to my new blog.  This will be where I will post on just about any topic.

Popularity: 1%

Filed under: Blogging No Comments

Most Popular Posts

  • ESXi Free Version Limitations
    I thought that after my previous post about ESXi really being free, I would write a post with the li...
  • BackupExec 2010 AVVI
    I've been working with Symantec's new VMWare agent for Backup Exec 2010 for the past couple of month...